Page 69 - IMCJ19s1
P. 69

available in seven minutes. I know that there are certain   Dr Hanaway:  Well,  we  don’t  know  about  the  antigenic
            airlines that are doing testing before they have people get   drift of the SARS coronavirus in terms of how it may shift
            on the plane. I know that there are projects being developed   and change. We don’t know if this will become endemic,
            by  the  American  Academy  of  Family  Physicians  and   like  influenza.  But  like  influenza,  as  with  SARS-CoV-2,
            others  that  recommend  the  viral  RNA  test  be  done  on   our focus is to be able to optimize the overall health of the
            patients  before  pre-op.  This  constitutes  an  admission   individual, to decrease the severity of symptoms, and to
            ticket to the hospital, not that they are immune but rather   decrease the long-term sequelae, the downstream effects
            a test to determine that they actually do not have the virus.  of having been infected. All crises provide opportunities.
               There is a difference between the sensitivity of a test   What do we have to learn from this and how can we do
            and the positive predictive value. For example, if you live   this differently?
            somewhere  with  a  1%  prevalence  of  the  SARS-CoV-2   In a public health perspective, we’re learning what we
            virus,  e.g.  middle  America,  even  a  test  with  95%  good   need  to  do  to  prepare.  From  a  clinical  perspective,  we
            sensitivity  and  specificity  will  have  significant  false   recognize that people who have complex chronic disease
            positives  when  we  measure  a  population.  If  we  were  to   are the ones who are at greatest risk for the morbidity and
            measure  people  in  line  for  a  football  game,  we  get  five   mortality of COVID-19. Knowing this, and using risk as a
            times as many false positives as true positives.  factor to help motivate individuals, we have an opportunity.
               But, if the prevalence in a population is 25%, such as   Our colleagues in other branches of medicine may not feel
            the recent data from New York CIty, and we do the same test   that  they  have  a  lot  of  ‘tools  in  their  toolkit’.  With
            in a similar group of people waiting in line for a football   functional medicine we say, “Here are a number of tools to
            game, there will be five times as many people who have true   help these patients. Our patients are out there, concerned
            positives  than  false  positives.  Here  I’m  talking  about  the   about getting infected. We have a significant opportunity
            public health perspective, not the clinical perspective. We   to decrease their risk of illness, decrease their severity of
            have to understand the prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 in   illness, and to improve them in recovery. This is a great
            the population because it will make a difference in how we   opportunity.  We  are  currently  reaching  out  to  various
            apply testing to make clinical decisions.        healthcare systems and letting them know about the tools
               In consideration of testing we break it down differently   that we have available.
            between the determination of risk for each person:  the   We encourage them to apply these tools first to the
            time  course  of  exposure  of  symptoms,  of  resolving   healthcare workers on the front lines. Help them to be able
            symptoms  or  in  recovery.  We  see  people  in  all  three   to  mitigate  the  risk,  and  assess  how  it  works?  We  don’t
            phases,  and  will  make  different  recommendations  to   have  real-world  data  yet.  We  don’t  have  randomized
            people  whether  they’re  exposed,  whether  they  have   control trials. We need to look at real world medicine and
            symptoms,  or  whether  they’re  showing  symptoms  after   ask, “What works and what doesn’t work?” Thus, we need
            having the virus infection.                      to gather the evidence to be able to understand which of
               We  find  that  recovery  from  COVID-19  can  be   these  components  work  the  best.  The  Institute  for
            complicated. There are issues that persist in a number of   Functional Medicine is excited to be a part of the journey
            people that relate to the pulmonary system and difficulty   toward health and healing,
            breathing or the mitochondria and energy production or
            the vasculature and micro clotting, or even the brain with
            ‘brain fog’ and PTSD. There are many different factors that
            we’ll be dealing with on the recovery side as well. Again,
            functional  medicine  looks  at  the  whole  person  and  is
            working  to  understand  the  mechanism  of  action  of  the
            virus  infection.  We’re  targeting  treatments,  low-risk
            treatments using food, using other lifestyle factors, using
            well-researched botanicals and nutraceuticals to be able to
            guide  our  treatment  recommendations,  in  prevention,
            treatment and recovery.

            IMCJ: To wrap up, do you think this is an opportunity to
            educate  your  conventional  healthcare  practitioners  who
            really didn’t understand functional medicine? Because it
            seems that a functional medicine approach can be a much
            better long-term solution as opposed to just being able to
            create a pill or vaccine that’s going to cure the particular
            case of COVID, but next year, maybe it mutates and the
            pharmaceutical solution does not work?


            Hanaway—Viewpoints                                       Integrative Medicine • Vol. 19, No. S1 • Epub Ahead of Print  67
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74